Just got back from seeing the movie with my wife & our 10 year old daughter. Skipping the details, it was ok. Wasn’t great and it wasn’t awful, but it did have some head scratching moments.
I present first my resume. What do I mean? I have seen Battle Royale, Running Man and even the Condemned…for that matter, I’ve even seen Surviving the Game with Ice-T. I’ve also read The Long Walk so I do know the premise very well. The Premise of humans killing humans for sport and it being a national pass time/for entertainment.
So I won’t crap all over the Hunger Games for using the premise, it’s one of those classic moral choice movies that presents a question and gives it a definite answer.
Is humans killing humans for entertainment a good idea? The answer is no.
Next I’ll say what I liked about the movie before going all negative, although it’s not all that negative, more of a shrug of the shoulders.
Oh and heavy Spoiler warning! I will spoiler everything I can get me hands on!
Oh and this is a look at the movie, I haven’t read the book, I know…the book is always better. I don’t care I’m 39, I’m not reading a tween-centric book.
First up - this isn’t Twilight. so the rumors I’ve heard (about it being another Twilight) are kind of stupid and those people are all kinds of stupid. Yes we have a potential love triangle. Yes the story involves teens. And yes, everyone seems much to pretty. The love stuff served a purpose, although they could have downplayed it more then they did, at worst they could have played it up more which would have been a bad idea.
From a technical stand point the movie was done well. It was well acted, very well acted in fact. The Designs were very imaginative and the look moving from the run down districts to the rich Capital was handled well.
Note: My wife did mention that the Capital seemed too well off and I tend to agree, the haves and have-nots were separated by a ridiculous gap.
The camera style - the weird constant moving camera is annoying. The action scenes seemed to be shot in such a haphazard way to prevent the gore from being seen. It made sense but was still annoying.
The first half of the movie was very enjoyable and well done. The quiet moments from meeting our heroes to the Reaping were good and the simple lifestyle goes great when we see the outlandish and lavish Capitol. This was all done great. If the actual Games had been done better this movie would have been great overall.
Yet the tournament (or Hunger games) was all very underwhelming and not because of the lack of gore, that’s fine, I can live with the rating the movie wanted. It was several things that made the actual Games lack luster. This is where all of the problems I had with the movie come from. After a great start, the movie starts to fall apart.
The creators had done such an excellent job of setting these games up that the games had to be done properly. Yet I’ll list some of the biggest problems I had with the actual games.
1) The over the top villains from district 1 and 2. Yes they did explain how they had arrogance and were trained for this kind of battle. Yet they were too arrogant, and not overly competent when it came down to it. This was in stark contrast to the overly good tributes who showed mercy and in Rue’s case, became a very willing ally.
2) Besides Catniss and Peeta, Rue was the only other tribute we met for any length of time, so when they started dying/killing, you didn’t feel anything. In fact, when Rue was killed I felt nothing because she was more of a substitute for Catniss’s sister then a separate character. Even at the end, when the District 1 main prick/villain seemed to repent, it didn’t hold any weight since we only knew him as villain kid #1. The movie has 2 hours and 22 minutes and we really only got to know a couple of characters.
3) They spend a lot of time pushing the fact that the contestant must win favor to get sponsors who can provide needed items. Although we see this a couple times, it almost seems as Catniss’s mentor went seeking sponsors, and they weren’t all that forthcoming on their own.
4) The finale. They even point out this in the movie that this is the finale…it’s being setup by the game runners. Ok, so what do they do in this tournament to have kids vs kids as some form of punishment. They send in 3rd party monster dogs. It becomes player vs monster, rather then player vs player. It removed any sense of the purpose of the games.
5) Finally the ending. In this genre, or premise of humans hunting humans for the entertainment of masses it ends in one of two main ways. The survivor is scarred for life and isn’t the same person they were. Or the hero (or heroes) bring the establishment down. The Hunger Games seems to be going in the direction of the latter, so at the end we have a vague wimpy ending where our hero doesn’t seemed bothered by the ordeal she’s just been though, and the overall villain (the President) is kind of miffed, but doesn’t seem all that bothered by the outcome…sort of just fizzles out.
So even with the issues I had, it’s still a decent movie. What is very cool is that it’s a movie about kids killing kids AND it’s made for kids! That’s pretty cool how that got pulled off.
Would I recommend it? I don’t know, make up your own mind, I do.